"...Uber may have started as an alternative to black cars, but it quickly moved into direct competition with taxis. The company opened the floodgates by letting virtually anyone offer rides through its app, disregarding city regulations and heavily subsidizing the service — for drivers and riders — to get everyone on board. Its labor model not only built on previous deregulatory efforts to dismantle the protections taxi drivers had earned, but specifically pulled from an earlier (mostly failed) effort in the 1990s to dismantle taxi regulations that was pushed by groups receiving funds from libertarian billionaires Charles and David Koch. This time it succeeded, and that’s had major consequences.
The company long tried to claim it was empowering the workers who deliver food and rides through its apps, even as its statements over how much it was paying workers turned out to be lies and workers themselves vocally pushed back against the company’s narrative. Unfortunately, the media were less interested in listening to them for far too long. Shervin Pishevar, an Uber investor and mentor to cofounder Travis Kalanick, was more honest in 2013 when he told Inc Magazine that Uber was “in the empire-building phase.” You don’t usually build an empire to hand the power to the people you’re strengthening your hold over, which is exactly what Uber was doing.
Uber didn’t become a global player in transportation because it wielded technology to more efficiently deliver services to the public. The tens of billions of dollars it lost over the past decade went into undercutting taxis on price and drawing drivers to its service — including some taxi drivers — by promising good wages, only to cut them once the competition posed by taxis had been eroded and consumers had gotten used to turning to the Uber app instead of calling or hailing a cab..."
Home
Today's Posts
Members
Chat
Contact
Login
Register